Social Sciences › Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations
Artificial Intelligence in Law
271 artículos indexados
Este asunto y su jerarquía proceden de la clasificación OpenAlex, el catálogo abierto de la investigación científica mundial.
Volumen mensual - últimos 12 meses
Países de los laboratorios
- Estados Unidos34 % · 47 artículos
- China16 % · 22 artículos
- Alemania13 % · 18 artículos
- India12 % · 16 artículos
- Francia5,1 % · 7 artículos
- Reino Unido5,1 % · 7 artículos
- Canadá4,4 % · 6 artículos
- Japón4,4 % · 6 artículos
Sobre 137 artículos de este tema con al menos un laboratorio localizado. 44 países representados.
Se trata del país del laboratorio, nunca de la nacionalidad de las personas. Un artículo firmado desde varios países cuenta para cada uno de ellos, por lo que las partes suman más del 100 %. La cobertura es parcial y el vacío no es aleatorio: un investigador cuya institución se desconoce suele publicar poco, lo que sobrerrepresenta a los laboratorios consolidados.
Últimos artículos
- A decision-support system applied to Law: Reasoning and explainability of the decision
Jeremy Bouche-Pillon (IRIT, IRIT-MELODI, IRIT-ADRIA, IRIT-LILaC), Pascale Zarat{\'e} (IRIT, UT Capitole, IRIT-ADRIA), Yannick Chevalier (IRIT-MELODI, IRIT, CNRS), Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles (IRIT-MELODI, IRIT, CNRS) · 29 de septiembre de 2026
The emergence of the digital transition brought an increasing need to control the processing of digital information, including in Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs). At the EU level, in recent years, many regulations have emerged to control data processing and exchange. Texts other than the GDPR, such …
- Opening LLM Judges: Recovering Preference Signals Beyond the Final Verdict
Sourabrata Mukherjee, Sunayana Sitaram · 29 de septiembre de 2026
LLM judges are widely used to evaluate model outputs, but their verdicts can be unreliable: a judge may favor the worse answer for its position, length, or other surface features. When a judge is wrong, is the information needed to judge correctly absent from the model, or present in its internal re…
- LLM Judge Validation Under Sparse Overlap: From Inference to Design
Junxuan Li, Arko Mukherjee, Soumyabrata Pal · 29 de septiembre de 2026
Validating an LLM-as-a-judge requires estimating its agreement with humans, yet annotation budgets rarely allow every item to be multiply labeled. We prove that this \emph{overlap sparsity} is the first-order determinant of wrong deployment decisions: at 5\% pairwise overlap, wrong-decision rates re…
- The Death of the Legal Author. Authority, Intention, And Law-Creation in the Advent of GenAI
Julieta A. Rabanos, Bojan Spai\'c · 29 de septiembre de 2026
Generative artificial intelligence in the form of chatbots based on large language models (LLMs) has taken the world of law by storm. Philosophy of law is struggling to catch up with the theoretical significance of the advent of technological development and the way it may modify traditionally estab…
- Evaluation is All You Need: Strategic Overclaiming of LLM Reasoning Capabilities Through Evaluation Design
Yongfu Zhu, Lin Sun, Jinzhu Wu, Weihong Lin, Xiaoqi Jian, Guangxiang Zhao, Change Jia, Linglin Zhang, Sai-er Hu, Yuhan Wu, Xiangzheng Zhang · 28 de septiembre de 2026
Reasoning models represented by the Deepseek-R1-Distill series have been widely adopted by the open-source community due to their strong performance in mathematics, science, programming, and other domains. However, our study reveals that their benchmark evaluation results are subject to significant …
- ARGUS: Role-Aware Event Knowledge Graphs for U.S. Employment-Discrimination Complaints
Sriram Kannan, Swetha Saseendran, Vishnu Vardhan Reddy Kandi, Leslie Barrett, Madhavan Seshadri, Enrico Santus · 25 de septiembre de 2026
U.S. employment-discrimination complaints describe complex event sequences that are not explicitly captured by lexical or embedding-based representations alone. We present ARGUS, a source-grounded pipeline that combines a 5W1H-inspired schema, legal-domain models, and LLM-based structured generation…
- Automated Regulatory Compliance Question Answering in Financial Services with Domain-Adapted Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Tobias Deu{\ss}er, Abhishek Pillai, Aurelio F. Bariviera, Dhananjay Bhardwaj, Lorenz Sparrenberg, David Berghaus, Christian Bauckhage, Rafet Sifa · 25 de septiembre de 2026
Financial institutions operate under dense, frequently amended rulebooks, and answering a compliance question correctly requires not only fluency but verifiable grounding in the authoritative text. Large language models are attractive for this task, yet the models that firms can realistically deploy…
- ContraVis: Evidence-Grounded Visual Analytics for Contradiction Review in Legal Contracts
Luis Sante, Paula Lima, Mariana Rocha, Jorge Poco · 24 de septiembre de 2026
Legal contracts are structurally complex documents in which contradictions may emerge across distant and interconnected provisions. Although large language models (LLMs) improve legal language understanding, contradiction analysis remains a human-centered and evidence-grounded review task. We presen…
- LabourCrew: A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Trustworthy Adversarial Deliberation and Statutory Reasoning over Labour Law
Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Mukaffi Bin Moin, Jubayer Al Mahmud, M. F. Mridha, Md. Alam Hossain · 24 de septiembre de 2026
In statutory question answering, every claim must be traceable to evidence, not merely relevant, since unverifiable labour-rights answers carry serious legal consequences. Current systems fall short: single-pass RAG cannot detect insufficient evidence, while multi-agent legal-debate systems treat gr…
- Same Scores, Different Decisions: Evaluating JEV and Language Models for Legal Document Understanding
Fan Zhang, Yankai Chen, Zhuohan Xie, Yixi Zhou, Sijia Peng, Lei Fan, Xinhua Ji, Cunyuan Zheng, Huangyong Shan, Philip S. Yu, Xue Liu, Yu Chen, Preslav Nakov, Songwei He · 24 de septiembre de 2026
Contract inference requires multiple judgments about a shared document, but aggregate accuracy can conceal changes in the individual decisions. Repeated agreement is also insufficient: a model may consistently return the wrong answer. In this paper, we compare Jev with nine language models on Contra…
- Cross-Lingual Legal QA for Vietnamese Labour Law: Retrieval, Translation, and Verifier-Guided Correction
Nguyen Minh Chi, Mo El-Haj, Nguyen Ha Thanh, Dawn Knight, Paul Rayson · 24 de septiembre de 2026
Cross-lingual legal question answering must retrieve statutes across languages while preventing unsupported legal claims. We introduce a bilingual evaluation suite of 231 Vietnamese--English question--answer pairs from Vietnamese labour law. Of these, 75 are additionally annotated for five challengi…
- LexLattice: Multilingual Extractive Summarization via Neural Cellular Automata on Document Hierarchies
Sujay Uday Rittikar, Sheela Ramanna · 24 de septiembre de 2026
Faithfulness is a central concern in legal text summarization, which motivates extractive approaches that select verbatim content traceable to its source. Such methods typically rank paragraphs or other structural units in isolation, yet give little attention to consolidating evidence that is distri…
- LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning
Qingjing Chen, Junkai Zhang, Shaochun Wang, Jiahao Ding, Siyuan Zheng, Yukun Yan, Zhi Zheng, Antonino Rotolo, Yun Liu, Weixing Shen · 24 de septiembre de 2026
Large language models are increasingly applied to high-risk domains such as law, yet complex legal reasoning remains limited by two structural challenges. First, existing RAG and GraphRAG methods emphasize lexical or semantic similarity while overlooking normative relations among legal provisions. S…
- Classifying Interpretive Canons at the Sentence Level: A Benchmark from the German Federal Constitutional Court
Felix Ringe · 24 de septiembre de 2026
Judicial reasoning remains challenging for large language models (LLMs) to analyze. This paper contributes a sentence-level benchmark for evaluating the ability of LLMs to classify interpretive canons as articulated by Larenz in the tradition of Savigny. Our contributions are threefold. First, we op…
- Mining Legal Arguments in U.S. Corporate Case Law
Luis Brena, William Jurayj, Gregory Deyesu, Zaid Al-Huneidi, Andrew Blair-Stanek, Benjamin Van Durme · 23 de septiembre de 2026
Legal argument mining supports passage classification, retrieval, and argument completion. This work introduces an expert-annotated dataset of 42 U.S. federal tax opinions on corporate reorganizations under I.R.C. {\S}368. To our knowledge, it is the first expert-annotated, tree-structured argument …
- Distributed Legal Infrastructure for a Trustworthy Agentic Web
Tomer Jordi Chaffer, Victor Jiawei Zhang, Sante Dino Facchini, Botao Amber Hu, Helena Rong, Zihan Guo, Xisen Wang, Carlos Santana, Giovanni De Gasperis · 23 de septiembre de 2026
The agentic web marks a structural transition from a human-centered information network to a digital environment populated by artificial intelligence (AI) agents that perceive, decide, and act autonomously. As delegated action unfolds at machine speed, exceeds discrete moments of human judgment, and…
- JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure
Yubo Li, Yidi Miao, Ramayya Krishnan, Rema Padman · 23 de septiembre de 2026
LLM-as-a-judge enables evaluation across diverse tasks, but inference cost and confidence reliability become critical at scale. We study whether a decision-only judge can provide an economical first pass and identify when stronger evaluation is needed. Comparing jev-as-a-judge with sixteen generativ…
- EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models
Yan Zhang, Ruien Li, Yaoyao Peng, Wanxin Ren, Yijia Zhang, Wusheng Zhang, Guangwen Yang · 23 de septiembre de 2026
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used in various industries. However, ensuring their compliance with complex laws and regulatory frameworks remains a great challenge. Existing evaluation paradigms mainly rely on static benchmarks that suffer from three severe limitations: First, the compliance…
- UK-PRBENCH: A Paragraph-Level Precedent Retrieval Benchmark for United Kingdom Case Law
Damith Premasiri, Tharindu Ranasinghe · 22 de septiembre de 2026
Prior case retrieval (PCR) aims to identify precedent cases relevant to a given query case. Existing PCR benchmarks and methods predominantly operate at the document level, treating entire judgments as the unit of relevance. This formulation is suboptimal for legal practitioners, as judgments addres…
- LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judges
Khaoula Chehbouni, Melina Medjdoub, Florian Carichon, Golnoosh Farnadi, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung · 22 de septiembre de 2026
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a popular alternative for evaluation. Often referred to as LLMs as judges (LLJs), these systems have been widely adopted by researchers and practitioners across a broad range of measurement tasks, driven by their strong performance, scala…
- Efficient LLM Distillation for Bangladesh Legal Context: A Smartphone-Compatible Retrieval-Augmented Generation Model
MD. Nafis Kamal, Mahadi Hasan Fahim, Talha Ridwan, Nadifa Zaman, Fariha Roushon Florin, Farig Yousuf Sadeque, Saadat Rafid Ahmed · 22 de septiembre de 2026
Legal information in Bangladesh is inaccessible to most citizens. Statutory text is English-only, trained lawyers are concentrated in urban centres, and cloud-dependent AI fails where mobile connectivity is unreliable, a setting in which hallucinated legal text causes direct harm. The system address…
- GRACE: Grounded Adversarial Reasoning over Canadian Law
Jiakang Xu, Wantong Huo, Udom Silparcha, Jonathan H. Chan · 22 de septiembre de 2026
Large language models have shown strong performance across a range of legal tasks, but existing benchmarks rarely evaluate the ability to take and defend a legal position, reason under incomplete information, or synthesize multiple statutory provisions. This gap is particularly pronounced for Canadi…
- Directing large language models to follow the letter or spirit of the law
Peng Qian, Andrew Li, Sam Chen, Sonia K. Murthy, Yonatan Belinkov, Tomer D. Ullman · 22 de septiembre de 2026
The distinction between the spirit and letter of the law is a central issue across research and everyday life, and a growing concern for building safe, intelligent machines. What is this distinction based on, and how can we develop machines that follow the intention behind a rule? We used targeted a…
- Schematize: An Agentic System for Generating and Refining Information-Extraction Schemas for Legal Research
Albert Sawczyn, Jakub Binkowski, Kamil Tagowski, {\L}ukasz Augustyniak, Berenika Kaczmarek-Templin, Tomasz Kajdanowicz · 22 de septiembre de 2026
Empirical legal research often relies on turning research questions into structured data extracted from large collections of rulings and judgments. Designing the extraction schema and then extracting the data remain a manual, expertise-heavy bottleneck. We present schematize, an open-source multi-ag…
- Beyond Accuracy and Surface Fluency: Risk-Sensitive Evaluation of LLMs for Legal Clause Generation
Devansh Singh, Sundaraparipurnan Narayanan · 22 de septiembre de 2026
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to draft contractual language, yet conventional accuracy or preference-based evaluations are poorly matched to legal drafting. A clause may be fluent and stylistically polished while still omitting an essential carve-out, allocating risk in an unenf…
